- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 7 November 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 26627/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
¶2The third respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into merits of the matter. It is open to the third respondent to pass order one way or other. Interested persons shall be put on notice before passing the final order.
¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
07.11.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To
1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Pudukottai.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Pudukottai.
3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Tirumayam, Pudukkottai District.
4.The Village Administrative Officer, Thulaiyanur Village, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
07.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Sankaran Pillai ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Pudukottai. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Pudukottai. 3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Tirumayam, Pudukkottai District. 4.The Village Administrative Officer, Thulaiyanur Village, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 3rd respondent to issue patta with regard to S.No.s 461/1G, 461/1H, 461/3A of Thulaiayanur village, Tirumayam taluk, Pudukottai district, in pursuant to the judgment and decree of this Court in S.A.(MD) No.1241 of 1997 by considering petitioner's representation dated 14th August 2023 within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.RM.Sivakumar For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.