R.Prabakaran v. The Banking Ombudsman Officer

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

08.06.2023 ogy To

¶1The Banking Ombudsman Officer, Reserve Bank of India, Rajaji Salai, Chennai – 600 004.

¶2The Indian Overseas Bank, Mount Road, Chennai – 600 002.

¶3The Indian Overseas Bank, Circle Office, 80 Feet Road, Anna Nagar, Madurai – 625 020.

¶4The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Sendurai Branch, Natham Taluk, Dindigul District – 624 403.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

08.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)No.9288 of 2017 R.Prabakaran ... Petitioner versus 1. The Banking Ombudsman Officer, Reserve Bank of India, Rajaji Salai, Chennai – 600 004. 2. The Indian Overseas Bank, Mount Road, Chennai – 600 002. 3. The Indian Overseas Bank, Circle Office, 80 Feet Road, Anna Nagar, Madurai – 625 020. 4. The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Sendurai Branch, Natham Taluk, Dindigul District – 624 403. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to stop auction proceeding over the jewels, agricultural bore well loan of the petitioner on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 17.06.2017. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sivakumar For R1 to R3 : No appearance For R4 : Mr.N.Dilipkumar