Valaivetti, v. The District Collector,

ORDER The petitioner has approached this Court with a grievance that he has been ex-communicated from the village.

2.Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents submitted that the issue has been amicably settled and there is no dispute among the parties, as on date.

3.Recording the aforesaid submission, this writ petition stands closed as no further order is required to be passed. No costs. Index :

26.06.2023 NCC : gk To

1.The District Collector,

B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk

2.The District Revenue Officer,

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi,

4.The Tahsildar, Kadaladi Taluk,

5.The Superintendent of Police,

6.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Keelakkarai,

7.The Inspector of Police, Sayalkudi Police Station, Sayalkudi,

26.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Valaivetti ... Petitioner v. 1.The District Collector, 2.The District Revenue Officer, 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi, 4.The Tahsildar, Kadaladi Taluk, 5.The Superintendent of Police, 6.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Keelakkarai, 7.The Inspector of Police, Sayalkudi Police Station, Sayalkudi, 8.R.Duraisamy ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 7 to take appropriate action as against the eighth respondent for ex- communicating the petitioner and his family members from their village based on the petitioner's representation dated 08.05.2017 and 15.05.2017 within a stipulated time limit. For Petitioner : Mr.M.S.Jeyakarthik For Respondents : Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Government Pleader for R.1 to R.7 No appearance for R.8 *****