S.Sureshkumar v. The Special Deputy Collector

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the sale deed was released after paying the stamp duty and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infrcutuous. No costs.

19.06.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶1The Special Deputy Collector (Stamps), Kokkirakulam, Tirunelveli District.

¶2The Sub-Registrar, Sub-Registrar Office, Melapalayam, Tirunelveli District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

19.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.Sureshkumar ... Petitioner versus 1. The Special Deputy Collector (Stamps), Kokkirakulam, Tirunelveli District. 2. The Sub-Registrar, Sub-Registrar Office, Melapalayam, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to release the sale deed registered before the 2nd respondent in Document No.568/2017 registered on 20.02.2017 to the petitioner within the time fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Vignesh For Respondents : Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Government Pleader