Parimala, W/O.Rajendran, v. The Superintending Engineer,

ORDER The petitioner, with an apprehension that the electric poles situated in S.No.86/4 in second pit would be shifted, has filed this writ petition in the year 2017 for a mandamus not to shift the same.

2.Learned Standing Counsel, on instructions, submitted that they are not having any proposal to shift the electric poles, which are existing in S.No. 86/4.

3.Recording the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel, this writ petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index :

21.06.2023 NCC : gk

B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk

21.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and WMP(MD)No.10478 of 2017 Parimala ... Petitioner v. 1.The Superintending Engineer, Office of the Superintending Engineer, TNEB, Madurai Distribution Circle, K.Pudhur, Madurai District. 2.The Divisional Engineer, Distribution, TNEB Generation and Distribution Corporation, Samayanallur, Madurai. 3.The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Distribution, TNEB Generation and Distribution Corporation, Samayanallur, Madurai. 4.The Assistant Engineer, Distribution, TNEB Generation and Distribution Corporation, Samayanallur, Madurai. 5.S.P.Udaya Poongundram ... Respondents [R.5 impleaded vide order dated 28.07.2020] Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents not to shift the electric pole situated in Paravai Village S.No.86/4 in second pit, which provide electricity connection to the petitioner's agricultural land in connection no.SL.No.073928 for the irrigation work of her agricultural land. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Alagumani For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, Standing Counsel for R.1 to R.4 No appearance for R.5 *****