VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S.Boopathy, v. The Secretary to Government,

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
14 June 2023
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 13042/2017

Judgment

O R D E R This writ petition is filed challenging the disciplinary proceedings.

2.Subsequently, the disciplinary proceedings ended up in punishment and the punishment is implemented. Therefore, nothing survives for adjudication. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index : Yes / No

14.06.2023 Internet : Yes NCC : Yes / No Tmg To The Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Fort St.George, Chennai. S.SRIMATHY, J Tmg

14.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and W.M.P.(MD)No.10103 of 2017 S.Boopathy ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Fort St.George, Chennai. 2.The Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation, (Kumbakonam) Limited, New Railway Feeder Road, Kumbakonam. 3.The Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation, (Villupuram) Limited, Villupuram. 4.The Enquiry Officer/Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation, (Coimbatore) Limited, Coimbatore. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned charge memo issued in Ref.f.F.vz;.404/6404/b7/ j.m.Ngh.f (tp)/2013, dated 19.11.2013, by the 3rd respondent and the consequential second show cause notice issued in j.m.Ngh.f./Fk;g/rl;lk; - $l;lhd/rpwg;G/2017, dated 20.03.2017, issued by the 2nd respondent to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.H.Thayumanaswamy For R1 : Mr.M.Lingadurai Special Government Pleader For R2 to 4 : Mr.D.Sivaraman

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.