M.Paramasivam, v. The Secretary,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.10371 to 10380 of 2017 W.P.(MD)No.13308 of 2017 M.Paramasivam ... Petitioner versus

¶2M/s.Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited, Rep. by General Manager, Marshalls Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned notice issued by the 4th respondent in Proceedings Na.Ka.A1/5770/2017 dated 14.07.017 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Prasanna Vinoth For R1 : Mr.R.Vijaya Raghavan For R2 : Ms.Annie Abinaya Standing Counsel For R3 to R5 : Mr.J.K.Jeyaseelan, Government Advocate W.P.(MD)No.13309 of 2017 M.Paramasivam ... Petitioner versus

¶2M/s.Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited, Rep. by General Manager, Marshalls Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned notice issued by the 4th respondent in Proceedings Na.Ka.A1/5770/2017 dated 14.07.017 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Prasanna Vinoth For R1 : Mr.R.Vijaya Raghavan For R2 : Ms.Annie Abinaya Standing Counsel For R3 to R5 : Mr.J.K.Jeyaseelan, Government Advocate W.P.(MD)No.13310 of 2017 Radhakrishnan ... Petitioner versus

¶2M/s.Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited, Rep. by General Manager, Marshalls Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned notice issued by the 4th respondent in Proceedings Na.Ka.A1/5770/2017 dated 14.07.017 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Prasanna Vinoth For R1 : Mr.R.Vijaya Raghavan For R2 : Ms.Annie Abinaya Standing Counsel For R3 to R5 : Mr.J.K.Jeyaseelan, Government Advocate COMMON ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that these writ petitions have been filed challenging the notice issued by the 4th respondent/the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti on the ground that he is not having any jurisdiction to issue notice. He further submits that the impugned notice was issued during the distribution of signals in analog mode and now, the signals are distributed only on digital mode. Therefore, there is no consequence on this impugned notice. Hence, he is not pressing these writ petitions. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, these writ petitions are closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

16.11.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶2The General Manager, M/s.Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited, Marshalls Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

16.11.2023