Arumugam.M v. The Superintendent of Police

O R D E R This writ petition has been filed seeking for direction to the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere in the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property of the petitioner at the instigation of the 3rd respondent by considering the petitioner's representation, dated 23/10/2023 within a stipulated period as prescribed by this court.

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

3.Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. 15/11/2023 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No er To,

1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruppuvanam Police Station, Thiruppuvanam, Sivagangai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN, J er WP(MD)No.25903 of 2023 15/11/2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 15/11/2023 CORAM The Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN WP(MD)No.25903 of 2023 M.Arumugam : Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruppuvanam Police Station, Thiruppuvanam, Sivagangai District. 3.Nagendran : Respondents PRAYER:-Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, directing the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere in the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property of the petitioner at the instigation of the 3rd respondent by considering the petitioner's representation, dated 23/10/2023 within a stipulated period as prescribed by this court. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Jeyasankar For R1 and R2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Criminal Side)