Sami, S/O.Madasamy, v. The District Collector

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

26.04.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶1The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sattur, Virudhunagar District.

¶3The Tahsildar, Rajapalayam Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

¶4The Village Administrative Officer, North Devathanam Village, Virudhunagar District.

¶5The Inspector of Police, Seithur Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

26.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Sami ... Petitioner versus 1. The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sattur, Virudhunagar District. 3. The Tahsildar, Rajapalayam Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 4. The Village Administrative Officer, North Devathanam Village, Virudhunagar District. 5. The Inspector of Police, Seithur Police Station, Virudhunagar District. 6. Vanaraj ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 5 herein to take action against the Kattapanchayatdars, North Devathanam Village, Rajapalayam Taluk, Virudhunagar District within the stipulated period. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jothi Basu For R1 to R5 : Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Govt. Pleader