Muneeswari v. State Rep.By Chief Secretary

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in the writ petition has been granted to the petitioner. He has also produced the proceedings of the 4th respondent to that effect.

¶2Recording the said submission, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

23.06.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶1The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai.

¶2The Home Secretary, Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai.

¶3The Secretary, Adi Dravidar & Tribal Welfare Department, Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

¶4The District Collector, Collectorate Complex, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

¶5District Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Officer, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

23.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)No.13480 of 2017 Muneeswari ... Petitioner versus 1. State represented by The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai. 2. The Home Secretary, Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai. 3. The Secretary, Adi Dravidar & Tribal Welfare Department, Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai. 4. The District Collector, Collectorate Complex, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 5. District Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Officer, Dindigul, Dindigul District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent No.4 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 05.06.2017 to grant additional relief in the respect and manner of basic pension with dearness allowance. For Petitioner : M/s.S.E.Monica A.Vincent For Respondents : Mr.M.Siddharthan, Additional Govt. Pleader