VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

M.Yogamalar v. The Inspector General of

DISMISSED AS ABATED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 August 2023
Bench
Battu Devanandauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 1496/2017

Judgment

O R D E R Mr.N.Tamilmani, learned counsel for the petitioner represents that the sole petitioner died. The learned counsel further submits that in view of such situation, no further adjudication is required.

¶2The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.

¶3In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as abated.

¶4No costs.

¶5Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

10.08.2023 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No CM To,

1.The Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, Raja Annamalai Puram, Four Shore Estate, Chennai – 600 028.

2.The Additional Chief Secretary (FAC), Government of Tamilnadu, Commercial Tax and Registration Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

BATTU DEVANAND, J. CM W.P.(MD)No.1496 of 2017 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.1215 and 1216 of 2017

10.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND W.P.(MD)No.1496 of 2017 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.1215 and 1216 of 2017 M.Yogamalar ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, Raja Annamalai Puram, Four Shore Estate, Chennai – 600 028. 2.The Additional Chief Secretary (FAC), Government of Tamilnadu, Commercial Tax and Registration Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai – 600 009. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in G.O(D)No.452 Commercial Tax and Registration Department dated 02.12.2016 which is the consequential order of the 1st respondent in No.45440/Aa1/2013 dated 11.03.2016 respectively and quash the same and direct the respondents to release the stoppage of increment due to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Tamilmani For Respondents : Mr.A.Kannan Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.