VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Tvl.Singarammal Construction v. The Deputy Commissioner (State Tax)

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
26 October 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 25985/2023

Judgment

ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶2A mere look at the impugned order shows that it was passed without notice to the petitioner herein. Since the petitioner was not given reasonable opportunity, the same is set aside. The matter is remanded to the file of the second respondent to pass an order afresh on merits and in accordance with law.

¶3With this liberty to the second respondent, the Writ Petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

26.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No sji To

1.The Deputy Commissioner (State Tax), GST Appeal, Trichy.

2.The State Tax Officer, Aranthangi Assessment Circle, Pudukottai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. sji

26.10.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.22362 and 22364 of 2023 Tvl. Singarammal Construction, Rep. by its Partner: John Arumugam, S/o. Thiru. Udaiappan, 46 Madhagam Village, Avudayarkovil Taluk, Pudukkottai District 622 202. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Deputy Commissioner (State Tax), GST Appeal, Trichy. 2.The State Tax Officer, Aranthangi Assessment Circle, Pudukottai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings passed by the second respondent in his proceedings in order No. GSTIN : 33 ABUFS5858DIZP/2019-20, dated .04.2023 and Form GST DRC-07 Reference No:ZD330423089075G, dated 19.04.2023 and quash the same as the same is passed by grossly violating the principles of natural justice and also passed by violating the statutory provisions and direct the second respondent to redo the assessment afresh after providing us an opportunity of personal hearing. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Srinivasan For Respondents : Mr.A.Kannan Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.