- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 29 November 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 15060/2017
Judgment
ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
29.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes ssb
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ssb To The Superintending Engineer, Middle Cauvery Basin Circle, PWD, WRD, Tiruchirapalli – 620020. Dated : 29.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.11885 to 11887 of 2017 Veera Construction and Enterprises, Represented through it's Managing Partner, M.Sathiyaselan, Having office at No.155 B, Neerpalani Post, Viralimalai Taluk, Pudukkottai District. .. Petitioner Vs. The Superintending Engineer, Middle Cauvery Basin Circle, PWD, WRD, Tiruchirapalli – 620020. .. Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to finalize the tender process with regard to Tender Notification No.04/2017-18/V3/Na.Ka.Va.Va/Trichy/dated 27.06.2017 with specific reference to package No.04/TN IAMP (TN IAMVARM II)/ WRD/PON/WORKS/PHASE 1/2017-18, and pass such further or other orders as this Court. For Petitioner : Mr. P. Ganapathi Subramanian
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.