VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Premkumar v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 November 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 26330/2023

Judgment

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The fourth respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is for the fourth respondent to pass order one way or other. The fourth respondent shall put the interested persons on notice before passing the final order.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

03.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No SKM To

1.The District Collector, District Collectorate, Trichy.

2.The District Revenue Officer, District Collectorate, Trichy.

3.The Assistant Director, (Survey and Land Record Department), District Collectorate, Trichy District.

4.The Tahsildar, Thottiyam Taluk Office, Trichy District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. SKM

03.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Premkumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, District Collectorate, Trichy. 2.The District Revenue Officer, District Collectorate, Trichy. 3.The Assistant Director, (Survey and Land Record Department), District Collectorate, Trichy District. 4.The Tahsildar, Thottiyam Taluk Office, Trichy District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to rectify the FMB and UDR in respect of old Survey No. 65/6 and new Survey No.618/14 situated at Kolakkudi Village, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District, on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 18.10.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Arunraj For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.