- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 4 December 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 15628/2017
Judgment
ORDER When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 29.11.2023 there was no representation for the petitioner and therefore, this matter was directed to be listed under the caption for dismissal. Accordingly this writ petition is listed today under the caption for dismissal. Even today there is no representation for the petitioner.
2.The learned Counsel for the respondents submit that this writ petition is filed challenging the tender notice dated 03.08.2017 and the tender was confirmed in the year 2017 and the work was also completed. Therefore, nothing survives in this writ petition.
3.Perusal of the records shows that the tender of the year 2017 is challenged in this writ petition and it was confirmed in the year 2017. Since it is reported that the work has been completed, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
04.12.2023 Internet : Yes / No DSK To
1.The General Manager, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003.
2.The Divisional Railway Manager, Southern Railway, Divisional Office, Madurai Division.
3.The Senior Divisional Engineer, Co-Ordination Works, Southern Railway, Divisional Office, Madurai.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk
04.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 04.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and WMP(MD)No.12355 of 2017 M.R.Hi-Tech Engineers Pvt Ltd, Represented by its Managing Director, G.Ramakrishnan No.131, Railway Feeder Road, Ramanathapuram – 623 504. ... Petitioner Vs 1.The General Manager, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003. 2.The Divisional Railway Manager, Southern Railway, Divisional Office, Madurai Division. 3.The Senior Divisional Engineer, Co-Ordination Works, Southern Railway, Divisional Office, Madurai. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus by calling for the records and quashing impugned intimation letter dated 03.08.2017 vide tender Notice No.U/W.496/1/T.No. 7/2016(Item No.14) of the 3rd respondent and consequently direct the respondents to allot the above tender bearing No.MDU/2007/2016 to the petitioner with suitable terms and conditions, if any by holding that the petitioner has the eligibility to participate in it within time frame. For Petitioner : No representation For Respondents : Mr.K.R.Laxman
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.