- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 3 November 2023
- Bench
- R.Vijayakumar
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 26382/2023
Judgment
ORDER The present writ petition has been filed by a Tradesman (Level-6) of the Transport Corporation seeking a Mandamus to disburse the difference amount of Gratuity and Encashment of Leave.
¶2According to the writ petitioner, he had retired from service on
31.03.2020. The settlement under Section 12 (3) of the Industrial Dispute Act was entered into between the trade union and the management on
24.08.2022, with effect from 01.09.2019. As per the said settlement, the salary and other benefits were enhanced.
¶3Seeking the said benefits, the petitioner has sent a representation on 05.06.2023. However, the same is yet to be disposed off. Considering the above said facts, the respondent is directed to confer the said benefits upon the writ petitioner and pass orders within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶4With the above said observations, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.
03.11.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : gbg To The General Manager, The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd., Tirunelveli Region, Tirunelveli. R. VIJAYAKUMAR
,J.
gbg Dated:
03.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.11.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR R.Murugan ... Petitioner Vs. The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd., Tirunelveli Region, Represented by its General Manager, Tirunelveli. ... Respondent PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to revise /re-fix the scale of pay of the petitioner w.e.f 01.09.2019 to till his retirement, based on the wage settlement, dated 24.08.2022 and consequently, to pay him difference / arrears of wages for the period from 01.09.2019 to 31.03.2020 and also terminal benefits namely Gratuity and Encashment of Leave, after revising the same based on such re-fixed scale of pay payable to him on the month of his retirement, together with 18% interest per annum, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arunachalam For Respondent : Mr.D.Jebaraj Standing Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.