- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 26 June 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 16243/2017
Judgment
ORDER When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement.
2.Recording the above submission and the endorsement, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is also dimissed.
26.06.2023 dsk To The Chief Manager cum Authorised Officer, Indian Bank, Car Street, Karur District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk
26.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.Damodharan ... Petitioner Vs The Chief Manager cum Authorised Officer, Indian Bank, Car Street, Karur District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 16.08.2017 submitted in person relating to one time settlement of the loan within a time frame as fixed by this Court. For petitioner : Mr.J.Muneer Khan For Respondent : Mr.M.Senthil Kumar
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.