VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Central Higher Secondary School v. L.Rejini

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 November 2023
Bench
V. Lakshminarayananauthor
Case no.
CONT P(MD) 2264/2023

Judgment

ORDER As per the orders of this Court dated 09.04.2019, it was held that the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) is not necessary for an appointment made by a minority School. The Central Higher Secondary School, Kayalpatnam is a minority institution. Therefore, as per the orders of this Court, the question of the teacher, Benazir, possessing TET qualification would not arise.

¶2This Court, however, did not grant positive direction to the respondents to approve the appointment of Benazir in the petitioner School. It only directed the said authorities to consider the proposal sent by the institution for the approval of appointment of Benazir. By an order dated

17.08.2022, the proposal has been rejected.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order passed by the respondents is erroneous and contrary to the orders of this Court.

¶4Sitting in contempt jurisdiction, I cannot set aside the rejection order. The appropriate remedy available for the petitioner is to file a Writ Petition challenging the same. Leaving it open to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 17.08.2022, this Contempt Petition stands closed.

21.11.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Lm To

1.The Chief Educational Officer, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin – 628 002.

2.The District Educational Officer, Tiruchendur – 628 215, Tuticorin District. V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J. Lm

in W.P.(MD).No.8434 of 2019

21.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.11.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN in W.P.(MD).No.8434 of 2019 Central Higher Secondary School, Kayalpatnam – 628 204, Tuticorin District, Represented by its Correspondent. .. Petitioner/Petitioner Vs. 1.L.Rejini, The Chief Educational Officer, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin – 628 002. 2.A.Gurunathan, The District Educational Officer, Tiruchendur – 628 215, Tuticorin District. .. Respondents 1 & 2 /Contemnors PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the contemnors/respondents for the deliberate and willful disobedience of the order dated 09.04.2019 of this Court made in W.P.(MD).No.8434 of 2019. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jerin Mathew For Respondents : Mr.T.Amjad Khan Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.