D.Umadevi, v. The District Collector,

ORDER The petitioner has submitted a representation not to erect any poles on her patta land and thereafter, filed this writ petition.

2.There is no representation for the petitioner.

3.The grievance of the petitioner is that for effecting service connection to the fifth respondent, the respondents Board are attempting to erect poles on her patta land.

4.Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Board submitted that they have not erected any poles in the petitioner's patta land and are not having any proposal for the same. Recording the aforesaid submission, this writ petition stands closed. No costs. Index :

26.06.2023 NCC : gk To

1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Chekkanurani Police Station, Madurai District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk

26.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI D.Umadevi ... Petitioner v. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation and Distribution, Usilampatti Sub Division, Madurai District. 3.The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Chekkanurani, Madurai District. 4.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Chekkanurani Police Station, Madurai District. 5.P.Sivanraj ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 09.05.2017 and pass appropriate orders. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Government Pleader for R.1 & R.4 Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, Standing Counsel for R.2, R.3 No appearance for R.5 *****