VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

I.Mohammed Aliar v. The Divisional Manager

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
26 June 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 16467/2017

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, with a grievance that his account has been freezed, has approached this Court for a mandamus directing the respondents to release his savings bank account.

2.There is no representation for the petitioner.

3.Learned Counsel appearing for the second respondent Bank, on instructions, submitted that the savings bank account of the petitioner has been defreezed and the petitioner is using the same. Recording the aforesaid submission, this writ petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index :

26.06.2023 NCC : gk

B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk

26.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and WMP(MD)No.13127 of 2017 I.Mohammed Aliar ... Petitioner v. 1.The Divisional Manager, Canara Bank, Dindigul Regional Office, No.23, New Agraharam, Palani Road, Dindigul. 2.The Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Batalagundu Branch, Batalagundu, Dindigul District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.05.2017 and to release the petitioner's saving bank account bearing No.0946101035928 freezed by the second respondent. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance for R.1 Mr.C.Jawahar Ravindran for R.2 *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.