- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 3 November 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 26427/2023
Judgment
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. He also made an endorsement to this effect.
¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the order dated 26.07.2023 passed by the District Revenue Officer, Dindigul. There shall be no order as to costs.
03.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No SKM To The District Revenue Officer, O/o. District Revenue Officer, Dindigul – 624 004, Dindigul District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. SKM
03.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN M.Shanmugasundaram ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, O/o. District Revenue Officer, Dindigul – 624 004, Dindigul District. 2.P.Saroja ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.09.2023 with time frame manner. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sheik Abdullah For Respondents : Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader for R.1
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.