Seeniammal .G v. The District Registrar

O R D E R Heard both sides.

¶2The petitioner alleges that the document No.1251/2010 registered on the file of the second respondent is vitiated by forgery. It is said to be a case of impersonation. Therefore, the first respondent can take action in the matter dehors Section 77A of the Registration Act and the circulars issued by IG of Registration. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner draws my attention to the Forensic Report issued in this regard.

¶3The first respondent is directed to conduct an enquiry on the petitioner's complaint. Notice will be issued to all the interested parties. Final order on merits and in accordance with law will be passed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. This writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. No costs.

02.11.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PMU 3 W.P.(MD)NO.26189 OF 2023 To:

¶1The District Registrar, 171, Palace Road, Madurai South, Madurai.

¶2The Sub-Registrar, Madurai South, Madurai. 4 W.P.(MD)NO.26189 OF 2023 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.26189 of 2023

02.11.2023

1 W.P.(MD)NO.26189 OF 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.26189 of 2023 G.Seeniammal ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Registrar, 171, Palace Road, Madurai South, Madurai. 2. The Sub-Registrar, Madurai South, Madurai. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to take necessary action on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 17.05.2023 pending before them within a time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Andiraj For Respondents : Mr.M.Prakash, Additional Government Pleader. * * * 2 W.P.(MD)NO.26189 OF 2023