K.Swaminathan, v. The Chairman,

ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous.

¶2In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

29.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes ssb

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ssb To

1.The Chairman, TANGEDCO, Chennai.

2.The Chief Engineer, Thermal/Gas Turbine Projects, Chennai.

3.The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, Valudhur Thermal/Gas Turbine Power Stations, Valudhur, Valandharavai (BPO), Ramanathapuram-623 536. Dated : 29.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.13743 and 13744 of 2017 K.Swaminathan .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chairman, TANGEDCO, Chennai. 2.The Chief Engineer, Thermal/Gas Turbine Projects, Chennai. 3.The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, Valudhur Thermal/Gas Turbine Power Stations, Valudhur, Valandharavai (BPO), Ramanathapuram-623 536. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining the Impugned E-tender notification issued by the 3rd respondent in Tender Specification No. SE/ VGTPS / RMD / W.C.No. 60/2017-18 dated 29.08.2017 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents to issue fresh e-tender notification with BQR (Bid Qualification Requirements) for the same allotted work as mentioned in the Notification. For Petitioner : Ms.A.Banumathy For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel