VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Nagammal, v. Marimuthu,

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
26 September 2023
Bench
C.Kumarappanauthor
Case no.
CRP(MD) 2394/2019

Judgment

O R D E R The instant Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order dated 18.06.2019 passed in I.A.No.954 of 2017 in O.S.No.84 of 2017 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kulithalai.

¶2When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the suit, in which the present Civil Revision Petition has arisen, has already been dismissed for default. Therefore, nothing survives in this Civil Revision Petition.

¶3In the result, this Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. However, in the event of suit is ordered to be restored the petitioners are at liberty to file an appropriate application to revive the Civil Revision Petition. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

26.09.2023 NCC : Yes/No

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi To

¶1The District Munsif Court, Kulithalai. C.KUMARAPPAN,J. ebsi C.R.P(MD)No.2394 of 2019

26.09.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN C.R.P.(MD)No.2394 of 2019 and C.M.P(MD) No.12587 of 2019 1. Nagammal 2. Kamatchi @ Kanagambal ... Petitioners/Petitioners/ Plaintiffs -vs- 1. Marimuthu 2. Arumugam 3. Saroja 3. Periyasamy 4. Ramachandran 5. Murugan 7. Thangavel ... Respondents 1 to 7/ Respondents 1 to 7/ Defendants 1 to 7 8. Senthilkumar 9. Tamilselvan ... Respondents 8 and 9 / Respondents 8 and 9/ Proposed Defendants 8 & 9 (Respondents 1 to 7 herein remained ex parte before the Court below and hence, notice to them may be dispensed with and they are given up) PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order dated 18.06.2019 passed in I.A.No.954 of 2017 in O.S.No.84 of 2017 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kulithalai. For Petitioners : Mr.G.Sridharan For Respondents : Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj – for 8 and 9 : for R1 to R7 – ex parte vide in EB

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.