- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 4 December 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 28447/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
¶2The second respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the second respondent to pass order one way or the other. Interested persons shall be put on notice before passing the order.
¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
04.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani, Dindigul District.
2.The Tahsildar, Gujiliamparai Taluk Office, Gujiliamparai, Dindigul District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Gujiliamparai Police Station, Gujiliamparai, Dindigul District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
04.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN A.Sanjeevi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani, Dindigul District. 2.The Tahsildar, Gujiliamparai Taluk Office, Gujiliamparai, Dindigul District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Gujiliamparai Police Station, Gujiliamparai, Dindigul District. 4.Kamalayee 5.Murugesan 6.Sangapillai ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents herein to cancel the patta on the name of the 4 and 6th respondents herein with regard to property in Survey No. 189/5 to an extent of 1/4 cent situated at Palayam Village, Gujiliamparai Taluk, Dindigul District based on the petitioner's representation dated 28.08.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Gomathisankar For Respondents : Mr.M.Siddharthan Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2 : Mr.A.Albert James Government Advocate for R3
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.