VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Kulanthai Theras v. The District Revenue Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 November 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 26598/2023

Judgment

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The third respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the third respondent to pass order one way or the other. Interested persons shall be put on notice before passing the order.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

06.11.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai Collectorate, Sivagangai District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, RDO Office, Sivagangai District.

3.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Kalayarkovil Taluk, Sivagangai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

06.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Kulanthai Theras ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai Collectorate, Sivagangai District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, RDO Office, Sivagangai District. 3.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Kalayarkovil Taluk, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.10.2023 to carry out changes in the Village Revenue Records as per the order of the 3rd respondent in Vee.Ma.O.No.253/1994 in connection with Natham House Site assignment and to issue on order to grant natham Chitta and Adangal in Sivagangai District Kalaiyarkovil Taluk, Kollangudi Revenue Group, Periyanarikottai Village in Old Survey No.300/12, and the New present survey No.500-part for an extend of 0.02.0 Ares. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vivekanandan For Respondents : Mr.M.Siddharthan Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.