Subramani .A v. The District Collector

ORDER

Heard both sides.

2.The materials placed before this Court are absolutely insufficient to enable me to grant relief as sought for. I wanted the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner to trace the petitioner's title. The petitioner's counsel unable to do so. I am not able to grant relief. The petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action.

3.With this liberty to the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

12.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To

1.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Madurai District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai District, Madurai.

3.The Tahsildar, Kallikudi Taluk, Madurai District.

4.The Surveyor, Kallikudi Taluk, Kallikudi, Madurai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

12.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN A.Subramani ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Madurai District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai District, Madurai. 3.The Tahsildar, Kallikudi Taluk, Madurai District. 4.The Surveyor, Kallikudi Taluk, Kallikudi, Madurai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 3 and 4 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 25.08.2023 and issue a separate patta in Survey No. 145/2A for the petitioner landed property of 61 cents at Chennampatty Village, Kallikudi Taluk, and also made necessity survey the said lands with in the line frame trust may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Saravanan For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate