- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 November 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 19609/2017
Judgment
ORDER When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement so.
2.Recording the above submission and the endorsement, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
30.11.2023 Internet : Yes / No DSK To
1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District.
2.The Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Water Resources Organisation, Sivagangai.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk
30.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 30.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and WMP(MD)No.15888 of 2017 C.T.Ramesh ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District. 2.The Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Water Resources Organisation, Sivagangai. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus directing respondents to conduct tender for Tank Excavation works in Sivagangai District with transparent manner by following the TN Transparency in Tenders Act and Rules. For Petitioner : Mr.RM.Arun Swaminthan For Respondents : Mr.G.Suriyanandh Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.