Desika Sankar.A v. The Superintending Engineer

ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. He also made an endorsement to this effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

03.10.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The Superintending Engineer, Office of the Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, Kanyakumari Electricity Distribution Circle, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

2.The Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Kanyakumari Electricity Distribution Circle, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Mylaudy, Kanyakumari District.

4.The Junior Engineer, TANGEDCO, Mylaudy, Kanyakumari District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and W.M.P(MD)Nos.22243 & 22244 of 2022

03.10.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)Nos.22243 & 22244 of 2022 A.Desika Sankar ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintending Engineer, Office of the Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, Kanyakumari Electricity Distribution Circle, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 2.The Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Kanyakumari Electricity Distribution Circle, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Mylaudy, Kanyakumari District. 4.The Junior Engineer, TANGEDCO, Mylaudy, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 14.10.2022 with Annexure and the consequential impugned order dated 14.10.2022 with annexure on the file of third respondent and the consequential impugned order dated 15.10.2022 in Ka.No.EniPo/V/Mylaudy/A.No.241/22 on the file of fourth respondent and quash the illegal and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 herein to conduct inspection and ensure that the Electricity connections in Service Nos. 145-017-183, 145-017-188, 145-017-250, 145-017-232 and 145-017-269 in the name of the petitioner are placed in the correct Survey Numbers in which it was sanctioned and consequently directed the respondents 3 and 4 herein to return the penalty amount charged on the petitioner after detections within the timeframe stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajasekar For Respondents : Mr.S.Dheenadhayalan Standing Counsel