- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 November 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 26497/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents 1 and 2.
2.The petitioner wants the authorities to implement the decision taken in the petition mentioned peace committee meeting held on
05.01.2023. It has been held time and again that decisions taken in peace committee meetings do not have any statutory value and no legal consequence can flow therefrom. I, therefore, cannot grant the relief sought for and the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.
06.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-
1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.
2.The Tahsildar, Manamadurai Taluk, Sivagangai District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
06.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Karuppasamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2.The Tahsildar, Manamadurai Taluk, Sivagangai District. 3.Sakthi @ Sakthivel 4.Ramanarayanan ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 2 to implement the peace committee meeting action in Na.Ka.No.A4/34/2023, dated 05.01.2023 within a time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Mahava Govindhan For Respondents : Mr.M.Prakash, Addl. Government Pleader for R1 & R2.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.