S.Kalimuthu v. Tmt.T.Sabeetha

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.08.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL CONT.P.(MD)No.384 of 2013:- S.Kalimuthu

disobedience of the order of this Court, dated 17.11.2011 in W.A.

(MD)No.1342 of 2011 amount to Contempt of Courts under Section 11 CONT.P.(MD)No.385 of 2013:- S.Abraham

disobedience of the order of this Court, dated 17.11.2011 in W.A.

(MD)No.1344 of 2011 amount to Contempt of Courts under Section 11 CONT.P.(MD)No.386 of 2013:- D.Hema Sorubarani

disobedience of the order of this Court, dated 22.12.2011 in W.A.

(MD)No.1598 of 2011 amount to Contempt of Courts under Section 11 CONT.P.(MD)No.387 of 2013:- K.Venkitaraman

disobedience of the order of this Court, dated 22.12.2011 in W.A.

(MD)No.1603 of 2011 amount to Contempt of Courts under Section 11 CONT.P.(MD)No.388 of 2013:- K.Kamaraj

disobedience of the order of this Court, dated 22.12.2011 in W.A.

(MD)No.1625 of 2011 amount to Contempt of Courts under Section 11 For Petitioner :Mr.S.Xavier Rajini For Respondent :Mr.M.P.Senthil Government Pleader (in all cases) ***** COMMON ORDER (Order of the Court was made by C.V. KARTHIKEYAN, J.) It is stated by the learned Government Pleader that directions have been complied with. Even otherwise the order of the writ appeals was passed in the year 2011 and the Contempt Petitions were filed in the year 2013. There was a duty on the part of the writ appellant/contemnor to have informed if the order had been complied. One order of compliance had been filed. All the contempt petitions stand closed.

[C.V.K., J.] [R.S.V., J.]

11.08.2026 ta To The Secretary, CONT.P.(MD)Nos.384etoe388eofe2013 oC.V.oKARTHIKEYANoo,oJo. AND R.SAKTHIVEL,oJ. o ta CONT.P.(MD)No.384otoo388oofo2013

11.08.2026