- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 9 June 2023
- Bench
- S Justice S.Srimathy
- Case no.
- CONT P(MD) 1878/2022
Judgment
O R D E R Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.V.Omprakash, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the respondent is submitted that the order of this Court is complied with. The said submission is recorded.
¶3Recording the aforesaid submission, this Contempt Petition is closed. In case, if the respondent has not disbursed any monetary benefits as stated in the G.O., within a period of Eight weeks, the petitioner is at liberty to reopen this contempt petition.
09.06.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes ksa
S.SRIMATHY, J
ksa CONT.P(MD)No.1878 of 2022
09.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY In W.P.(MD)No. 4214 of 2016 J.Padmavathy ... Petitioner vs. Mr.Manivanan, The District Elementary Educational Officer, Karur, Karur District. ... Contemnor PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for disobedience of the order made in W.P(MD)No.4214 of 2016 dated 19.04.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murali For Respondent : Mr.V.Omprakash Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.