VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

R.Perumal Thevan v. The Superintendent of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 November 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 19787/2023

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition filed to direct the second and third respondents herein not to harass the petitioner under the guise of the enquiry in pursuance to the complaint lodged by the fourth respondent.

¶2Learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the issue between the parties is a case of job racketing and not an issue over money transaction. On the basis of the complaint given by the fourth respondent, enquiry was undertaken. During the course of enquiry both parties appeared and this petitioner undertook to return the amount. On the basis of the undertaking given by the petitioner, the complaint was closed on 25.02.2023.

3.In view of the above submissions, since, the complaint was closed on 25.02.2023, the question of harassment at the hands of the official respondents does not arise. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

07.11.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : pnn To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN

,J.

pnn

07.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.11.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN C. Senthil Murugan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli District. 4.Ganaraj ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the respondent No.2 & 3 herein to not to harass the petitioner on the guise of the enquiry in pursuance to the complaint lodged by the respondent no.4. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Senthil Murugan For R1 to R3 : Mr. M. Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.