S.Muthu Maheswari v. The Superintendent of Police

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

26.04.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶1The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

¶2The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sivakasi,

¶3The Inspector of Police,

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

¶4The Sub-Inspector of Police,

26.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)No.16495 of 2017 S.Muthu Maheswari ... Petitioner versus 1. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sivakasi, 3. The Inspector of Police, 4. The Sub-Inspector of Police, 5. Mrs.Thilagarani Sub-Inspector of Police, 6. Mr.Muthu Mariappan, Special Sub-Inspector of Police, 7. Mr.Sasi Kumar, Police Constable, 8. Mr.Arunachala Nadar ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 5 to 7 herein not to interfere with the Civil dispute in respect of the property situated in 53, East Car Street, Sivakasi, For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jothi Basu For R1 to R4 : Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Govt. Pleader For R8 : Mrs.P.Jessi Jeeva Priya