VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S.Baskararaja v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
15 June 2023
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 20687/2017

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition is filed to quash the impugned order, 24.07.2013 with consequential relief to grant retirement benefits.

¶2The respondents have filed counter stating that the Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chennai, in their letter addressed to all Collectors in RC.No.Service 95(1)/20277/2019, dated 18.05.2020.

¶3When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Accountant General submitted that, based on the aforesaid letter all retirement benefits were granted to the petitioner as per law and he has also received the same. He further submitted that pensionary benefits have also disbursed as per law.

¶4In view of the aforesaid submission, nothing survives for adjudication. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Incase, if there is no further revision, the petitioner is at liberty to claim the same as per law. No Costs. Index : Yes / No .2023 Internet : Yes

ksa To

¶1The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

¶2The Accountant General (A & E), Chennai.

¶3The Tahsildar Iluppur Taluk, Pudukottai District. S.SRIMATHY, J ksa W.P.(MD)No. 20687 of 2017

15.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.(MD)No. 20687 of 2017 S.Baskararaja ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 2. The Accountant General (A & E), Chennai. 3. The Tahsildar Iluppur Taluk, Pudukottai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records on the file of the 2nd respondent pertaining its order in Proc.No.Rc.4638/2011/A3, dated 24.07.2013 and to quash the same with a consequential direction to the respondents to grant the petitioner all retirement benefits and pension etc., as a Special Grade Village Administrative Officer. For Petitioner : Mr. N. Balakrishnan For R-1 & R-3 : Mr. R. Sureshkumar Additional Government Pleader For R-2 : Mr.P.Gunasekaran

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.