C.Nandhakumar, v. The Commissioner,

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

09.06.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet: Yes / No. To The Commissioner, Pudukottai Municipality, Pudukottai.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

09.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)No.19634 of 2017 C.Nandhakumar ... Petitioner versus 1. The Commissioner, Pudukottai Municipality, Pudukottai. 2. Manikandan 3. Kumar 4. K.Ravi 5. K.R.Karuppaiah 6. Ramakrishnan ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to implement its order passed in his proceedings Na.Ka.No. 29927/2014/F2 dated 20.12.2014 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Karthick Ramkumar For R1 to R5 : No appearance For R6 : Mr.S.T.Sasidharan Tamilkani