Poovayee v. The Tahsildar

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The petitioner has sought a composite prayer. The question of conducting survey at the instance of the petitioner will arise only if she is having individual patta in her name. The petitioner admittedly is not having individual patta in her name. Therefore, the first part of the prayer can be agitated later. The petitioner has given an application before the second respondent for issuance of individual patta.

¶3The second respondent is directed to dispose of the said application on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into merits of the matter. It is open to the second respondent to pass order one way or the other. Interested persons shall be put on notice before passing the order.

¶4The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

06.11.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To The Tahsildar, Mannachanallur Taluk, Trichy District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

06.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Poovayee ... Petitioner Vs. The Tahsildar, Mannachanallur Taluk, Trichy District. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to survey and issue separate patta in petitioner's name by cancelling the joint patta no. 1108 for the land comprised in Survey no.284/3 to an extent of 1 acre 4 cents in vazhaiyur Village, Mannachanallur Taluk, Trichy District based on the petitioner representations dated 10.07.2021 and 29.06.2023 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu For Respondent : Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader