Spurgeon Samuel v. The Tahsildar

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The respondent is directed to dispose of the petition mentioned representation on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. The respondent shall put the interested persons, if any, on notice before passing final order. It is open to the respondent to pass order one way or the other.

3.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

06.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:- The Tahsildar, Taluka Office, Agasteeswaram Taluka, Kanyakumar District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias

06.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Spurgeon Samuel ... Petitioner Vs. The Tahsildar, Taluka Office, Agasteeswaram Taluka, Kanyakumar District. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to mutate the relevant revenue records and issue fresh patta in the name of the petitioner in respect of his lands in Re-Survey No.G3/6-12 and Re-survey No.G-11/4 in Vadacheri Village, Agasteeswaram Taluka, Vadacheri Registration Sub District, Kanyakumari District by considering his representation dated 07.09.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.Ajmal Khan, Senior Counsel, For M/s.Ajmal Associates. For Respondent : Mr.S.RA.Ramachandran, Addl. Government Pleader.