VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Radhakrishnan v. The Superintendent of Police

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
16 November 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 20449/2023

Judgment

ORDER This petition has been filed seeking direction to the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the name of enquiry.

2.It is a issue between the petitioner and one Kasiraman regarding some money transaction. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by Kasiraman, against the petitioner, enquiry is undertaken in C.S.R.No.1127 of 2023. During the course of enquiry, the petitioner appeared on 28.10.2023 and gave an undertaking. Based on the undertaking given by him, it was closed.

3.Since it is money transaction the above said enquiry was rightly closed. But, however, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that it is not a pure money transaction. The statement was obtained under force and compulsion. There is no money transaction between himself and one Kasiraman. But, however, since the complaint has been closed, nothing survives for further consideration in this case.

4.In view of the above this petition stands disposed of.

16.11.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : TM To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruneelakudi Police Station, (Circle Inspector Thiruvidaimaruthur), Thanjavur District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN

,J.

TM

16.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.11.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Radhakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruneelakudi Police Station, (Circle Inspector Thiruvidaimaruthur), Thanjavur District. ...Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the name of enquiry. For Petitioner : Mr.K.S.Duraipandian For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.