VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

G.Balasundaram v. The Deputy Inspector General of Registration

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
25 March 2026
Bench
Mummineni Sudheer Kumarauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 24753/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Judgment

O R D E R This writ petition is filed seeking Writ of Certiorarifed Mandamus to call for the records relating to the letter dated 10.10.2012 and to quash the same and also seeking consequential direction to the 3rd respondent to pay retirement benefits with interest at the rate of 12% from the date of retirement i.e., on 30.09.2008.

¶2Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Mr. Ajmal Khan, learned Additional Advocate General, brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner was permitted to retire from service on

30.09.2008, subject to the conclusion of the disciplinary proceedings, and that, for want of such conclusion, the petitioner's terminal benefits have not been paid. It is further brought to the notice of this Court that the said disciplinary proceedings have been concluded and a final order has been passed by the third respondent in G.O.Ms.No.355, dated

06.11.2025, imposing punishment of recovery of a sum of Rs.27,786/- from the petitioner and a cut of Rs.500/- from the pension for a period of six months. He further submitted that, in the light of the conclusion of the disciplinary proceedings, the petitioner would be entitled to all terminal benefits, subject to the punishment imposed in G.O.Ms.No.355, dated 06.11.2025.

¶3In the light of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed of, and the first respondent is directed to take all necessary steps for the payment of terminal benefits and to submit necessary proposals to the second respondent within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the said proposal, the second respondent shall process the same and release all terminal benefits payable to the petitioner within a further period of four weeks. Insofar as the claim of the petitioner for interest on the delayed payment of terminal benefits is concerned, the same is left open to the petitioner to agitate independently. No costs.

25.03.2026 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no gvn MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

, J.

gvn To:

¶1The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Office of the Deputy Inspector General of Registration, St. Mark's Street, Near Sankar Colony, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli-2.

¶2The Principal Accountant General (A&E), 361, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai-600 018.

¶3The Secretary, Commercial Taxes and Registration(H) Department, Secretariate, Chennai-600 009.

25.03.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25-03-2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR W.P.(MD)No.24753 of 2025 G.Balasundaram ...Petitioner Vs 1. The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Office of the Deputy Inspector General of Registration, St. Mark's Street, Near Sankar Colony, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli-2. 2. The Principal Accountant General (A&E), 361, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai-600 018. 3. The Secretary, Commercial Taxes and Registration(H) Department, Secretariate, Chennai-600 009. ... Respondents (R3 impleaded vide Court order dated 04.11.2025 in WMP(MD).24394 of 2025 in WP(MD).24753 of 2025 by KBJ) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to impugned letter dated 10.10.2012 issued by the 3rd respondent and to quash the same and consequentially direct the 3rd respondent to pay the all retirement benefits with interest at the rate of 12% from the date of retirement 30.09.2008 and consequentially sanction the regular pension payable to the petitioner and pass such further or other orders. For Petitioner : M/s.P.Jessi Jeeva Priya For Respondents Mr.M.Ajmal Khan Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.F.Deepak – For R1 & R3 : M/s.P.Gunasekaran Standing Counsel – For R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.