Mr.M.Krishnamoorthy, v. The Administrative Engineer,

ORDER When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement.

2.Recording the above submission and the endorsement, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

26.06.2023 dsk To

1.The Administrative Engineer, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, Project Division (Ramanathapuram Joint Water Project), Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kalayarkoil Police Station, Kalayarkoil, Sivagangai District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk

26.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and WMP(MD)No.17641 of 2017 M.Krishnamoorthy ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Administrative Engineer, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, Project Division (Ramanathapuram Joint Water Project), Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Kalayarkoil Police Station, Kalayarkoil, Sivagangai District. 3.Ramesh Babu 4.Albert ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to permit the petitioner to employ any workers in the project work done as per the work agreement dated 17.05.2017 entered by dint of the work order dated 04.04.2017 issued by the 1st respondent authority besides directing the 2nd respondent to take necessary action in nature of preventing the 3rd and 4th respondents causing any disturbances to the contract work done in the Kalayarkoil over head water tank pumping station based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner on 14.10.2017 and consequent receipt dated 19.10.2017. For petitioner : Mr.J.Muneer Khan For Respondent : Mr.M.Siddharthan Nos.1 and 2 Additional Government Pleader For Respondent : Mr.H.Hajamohideen Nos.3 and 4