- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 21 March 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 22880/2022
Judgment
ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed, invoking Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking direction, to call for the records pertaining to the CC No.24 of 2019 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Anti-Land Grabbing Special Court, Madurai, in Crime No.11/2012 dt. 3/2/2012 on the file of the Respondent Police and Quash the same.
¶2The contention of the petitioners is that based on the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant, the 1st respondent registered the First Information Report in Crime No.11 of 2012 for the offences punishable under Sections 120(b), 294(b), 419, 420, 468, 471 & 506(ii) IPC, against the petitioners.
¶3The legal heirs of the defacto complainant and the accused Nos. 1 to 7 are present before this Court. The accused No.8 who is reported to be dead, said to have impersonated the original owner and sold the property to the other accused. The legal heirs of the defacto complainant would submit that because of change of Sub-Registrar's office, they were not in a position to know the encumbrance of the above said property. Only thereafter, they came to know the encumbrance and lodged a complaint against the petitioners. Now the accused Nos.1 to 7 handed over the property to the respondents 2 to 4 and they have no objection to quash the C.C.No.24 of 2019 on the file of the learned Special Judicial Magistrate, Special Court for Anti Land Grabbing Cases, Madurai, which is pending against the petitioners. The accused have stated that they will not disputing the ownership of the property.
¶3The further contention of the petitioners is that they compromised the issue with the respondents 2 to 4 amicably. A joint memo of compromise was filed, which has been duly signed by the petitioners and the respondents 2 to 4 and also by their respective counsels.
¶4The petitioners and the respondents 2 to 4 appeared before this Court along with their counsels and also produced their Aadhar cards. They were also identified by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and the Investigation Officer. Both the parties were enquired by me and they accepted the terms of compromise. Hence, the Compromise Memo is recorded.
5.Considering the totality of the circumstances, the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners and also in view of the joint compromise memo, dated 22.12.2022, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending. Hence, all further proceedings in C.C.No.24 of 2019 pending on the file of the learned Special Judicial Magistrate, Special Court for Anti Land Grabbing Cases, Madurai,, is quashed and the compromise memo is recorded.
6.In the result, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and the entire proceedings in C.C.No.24 of 2019, pending on the file of the learned Special Judicial Magistrate, Special Court for Anti Land Grabbing Cases, Madurai, is hereby quashed in respect of the petitioners and the terms of joint compromise memo shall form part of this order. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
21.03.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : Indu G.ILANGOVAN
,J.
Indu To
¶1The learned Special Judicial Magistrate, Special Court for Anti Land Grabbing Cases, Madurai,
2.The Inspector of Police, (Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell) District Crime Branch, Madurai District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Dated: 21.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.03.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN and Crl.M.PMD) Nos.16214 and 16215 of 2022 1.M.S.Ganesan 2.Subramanian 3.R.Rajasekar 4.Nallu 5.Pandiyammal 6.Rajangam 7.M.S.Murugan ... Petitioners/Accused 1-7 Vs. 1. The State, represented by The Inspector of Police (Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell) District Crime Branch, Madurai District. ... Respondent/Complainant M.Shajathi Begum (Died) ... Respondent/Defacto Complainant 2. N.Noosaj 3.N.Imaan 4. N.Thakur ...Respondents 2 to 4 / Legal Heirs of Defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records pertaining to the CC No. 24 of 2019 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Anti-Land Grabbing Special Court, Madurai, in Crime No.11/2012 dt.3/2/2012 on the file of the Respondent Police and Quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Masilamani For R1 : Mr.S.Manikandan Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R2 to R4 : Mr.J.N.Mohamed Salman Yusuf
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.