Vanitha .C v. The District Registrar (Admin)

ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for R1 & R2. Issuance of notice to R3 to R10 is dispensed with.

¶2The petitioner has filed a petition before the first respondent invoking Section 77A of the Registration Act, 1908. The IG of registration has issued the circular directing that enquiry under the said provision shall be kept in abeyance till the larger Bench renders its decision.

¶3I therefore direct the first respondent to take action on the petitioner's petition dated 18.05.2023 on merits and in accordance with law based on the decision to be rendered by the Larger Bench. Action will have to be taken by the first respondent notwithstanding the passing of the impugned order dated

16.10.2023. The impugned order shall not come in the way.

¶4The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

03.11.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Registrar (Admin) Periyakulam, Theni District.

2.The Sub Registrar, Theni, Theni District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

03.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN C.Vanitha ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Registrar (Admin) Periyakulam, Theni District. 2.The Sub Registrar, Theni, Theni District. 3.P.Kannammal 4.Vairamani 5.Rajeswari 6.Mageswari 7.Chikkammal 8.Radhakrishnan 9.M.Selvam 10.Jaya ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the first respondent in Na.Ka.2896/E2/2023, dated 06.10.2023 and quash the same as illegal and consequently, direct the first respondent to conduct fresh enquiry and take necessary decision to cancel the documents referred in the petitioner's representation dated 14.10.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Swamy For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate for R1 & R2