VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

M.Anis Fayitha, v. The Commissioner,

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 November 2023
Bench
S.M. Subramaniamauthor, V. Lakshminarayanan
Case no.
WP(MD) 21442/2017

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The order impugned dated 25.05.2017, passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, would reveal that survey was conducted pursuant to the directions issued by this Court in W.P.(MD) No.7156 of 2017 and the authorities found that the subject property is a patta land.

¶2That being the findings in the impugned order, the petitioner, if aggrieved, is at liberty to approach the competent Civil Court of law in the manner contemplated.

¶3With this liberty, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. (S.M.S., J.) & (V.L.N., J.)

17.11.2023

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No SJ

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. SJ

17.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN and W.M.P.(MD) No.17708 of 2017 M.Anis Fayitha ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Aringar Anna Maligai, Madurai. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, Zone No.4, Madurai Corporation, Madurai. 3.Malliga 4.Nayeeb ...Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Na.Ka.No.Z4A3/12059/2017 dated 29.05.2017 and quash the same as illegal, consequently, direct the respondents No.1 & 2 to remove the encroachment in Madurai Corporation, Zonal No.4, Ward No.86, Chavadi 3rd Lane, Raajimar Street, Door No.SB527 to AL1201. For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah For Respondents : Mr.R.Murali Standing Counsel for R1 & R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.