VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

G.Shanmuganathan v. The Commissioner

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 November 2025
Bench
K.Kumaresh Babuauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 25744/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow K.Kumaresh Babu

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 28/11/2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU WP(MD)Nos.25744 and 24906 of 2025 and W.M.P(MD).Nos.20135, 20137 and 19568 of 2025 W.P(MD)No.25744 of 2025 G.Shanmuganathan ... Petitioner Vs ... Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records of the 2nd respondent pertaining to the impugned order Na.Ka.No.42/P and AI / 2020 dated 29.11.2022 and quash the same as illegal and direct the 2nd respondent to issue the order of appointment to the petitioner as senior Factory Assistant in the MBC category pursuant to the recruitment vide Advertisement No.10/2017 dated 30.10.2017 with all monetary benefits by considering petitioners representation dated 19.06.2025 within the stipulated time period. For Petitioner : G.Sakthi Rao, For R1 : Mr.F.Deepak Special Government Pleader For R2 & R3 : Mr.J.Devasenan Standing Counsel W.P(MD)No.24906 of 2025 R.Kombaiya ... Petitioner Vs ... Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records of the 2nd respondent pertaining to the impugned order Na.Ka.No.42/P and AI / 2020 dated 14.08.2024 and quash the same as illegal and direct the 2nd respondent to issue the order of appointment to the petitioner as senior Factory Assistant in the MBC category pursuant to the recruitment vide Advertisement No.10/2017 dated 30.10.2017 with all monetary benefits within the stipulated time period. For Petitioner : G.Sakthi Rao, For R1 : Mr.F.Deepak Special Government Pleader For R2 & R3 : Mr.J.Devasenan Standing Counsel COMMON ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Special standing counsel appearing for the respondents 2 and 3 would submit that appointment orders have been issued to the respective parties and also places on record the said orders of appointment.

¶2In view of the above submission, no further orders are required in these writ petitions. Hence, these Writ Petitions are closed. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

28.11.2025 tta TO K.KUMARESHoBABU,J tta WP(MD)Nos.25744oando24906oofo2025 and W.M.P(MD).Nos.20135,o20137oando19568oofo2025

28.11.2025

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.