V.E.Periyannan, v. The District Collector

ORDER This writ petition has been filed in the year 2017 for a Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from conducting the tender in respect of 80 works in the respondent Panchayat.

¶2When this writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous.

¶3In view of the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

28.11.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶1The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

¶2The Assistant Director (Panchayats) Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

¶3The Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayats), Kalayarkoil Panchayat Union, Kalayarkoil, Sivagangai District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

28.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)No.18252 of 2017 V.E.Periyannan ... Petitioner versus 1. The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2. The Assistant Director (Panchayats) Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 3. The Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayats), Kalayarkoil Panchayat Union, Kalayarkoil, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from conducting the tender in respect of 80 works mentioned in the order made in Na.Ka.A3/1639/2016 dated 28.08.2017 on the file of the 1st respondent without publishing the Tender Notification and without issuing the Tender Schedule to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Kannan For Respondents : Mr.G.Suriyanath, Additional Government Pleader