Palaniyandi v. The Superintendent of Police

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition is filed to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioners under the guise of enquiry on the complaint, dated 09.09.2008.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are harassed by the respondent Police unnecessarily, since the first petitioner's son involved in some sort of job racketing issue.

¶3The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that so far no complaint has been received against any of the petitioners and not even the son of the first petitioner is shown as an accused in any of the complaints.

¶4Considering the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), mere apprehension of the petitioners is not enough to entertain this petition. Hence, this petition deserves dismissal and accordingly dismissed.

09.11.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : INDU G.ILANGOVAN

,J.

INDU To

1.The Superintendent of Police Trichy.

¶2The Inspector of Police Mannachanallur Police Station, Trichy District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Pulivalam Police Station, Trichy District.

4.The Inspector of Police, Thiruverumbur Police Station, Trichy.

5.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch (DCB), Trichy.

6.The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Karur.

7.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

09.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.11.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN 1. Palaniyandi 2. P.Prabu 3. B.Krithika 4. V.Jeyapaul ... Petitioners No.1 to 4 Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police Trichy. 2. The Inspector of Police Mannachanallur Police Station, Trichy District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Pulivalam Police Station, Trichy District. 4.The Inspector of Police, Thiruverumbur Police Station, Trichy. 5.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch (DCB), Trichy. 6.The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Karur. ...Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioners under the guise of enquiry on the complaint, dated 09.09.2008. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sankar Ganeshan For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl. Side).