- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 22 June 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 22369/2017
Judgment
ORDER When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement.
2.In view of the above submission and the endorsement, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
22.06.2023 dsk To The Sub Registrar, Chookikulam Sub Registrar Office, TNAU Nagar, Rajakambeeram, Y.Othakadai, Madurai – 107.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk
22.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI G.Balamurugan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Sub Registrar, Chookikulam Sub Registrar Office, TNAU Nagar, Rajakambeeram, Y.Othakadai, Madurai – 107. 2.M.Poongavanam ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the 1st respondent not to execute any document through the General Power Deed in Document No.4911/2017 dated 13.11.2017 by the 2nd respondent based on the representation dated 24.11.2017 and 02.12.2017. For petitioner : Mr.M.Suresh For Respondent : Mr.M.Sarangam, No.1 Additional Government Pleader For Respondent : Mr.R.Ragavendran No.2
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.