- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 8 November 2023
- Bench
- R.Vijayakumar
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 26773/2023
Judgment
O R D E R The present Writ Petition has been filed by a "Driver Level-5" seeking a mandamus directing the respondent to pay the interest at the rate of 6% per annum due to the belated payment of terminal benefits. The petitioner had attained superannuation on 30.06.2018 and retirement benefits were disbursed only on 20.09.2019. The petitioner has sent a representation to the respondent on 20.08.2023, seeking interest for the said belated payment of terminal benefits.
¶2Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent.
¶3Considering the above said facts, the respondent is directed to settle the interest for the belated disbursement of the terminal benefits at the rate of 6% p.a., from the date of the petitioner's retirement till the date of realization within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶4With the above said observations, this Writ Petition stands allowed. There shall be no order as to costs.
08.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi To
¶1The Managing Director, The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Karur Region, Karur. R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J. ebsi W.P(MD)No.26773 of 2023
08.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR W.P(MD)No.26773 of 2023 A.Sekar ... Petitioner Vs. The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Karur Region, Represented by its Managing Director, Karur. ...Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to pay the petitioner interest at the rate of 6% per annum, for the period of delay from 01.07.2018 to 20.09.2019, in paying the amounts paid towards his terminal benefits, namely, EPF Employees's Contribution, Gratuity, Encashment of Leave within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court and without affecting his right to claim balance amounts towards those benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arunachalam For Respondent : Mr.K.Jagadees Balan Standing Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.