Boopathy v. The Executive Officer

ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

29.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes ssb

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ssb To The Executive Officer, O/o. The Town Panchayat, Illupur Post & Taluk, Pudukkottai District. Dated : 29.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.18956 and 18957 of 2017 Boopathy .. Petitioner Vs. The Executive Officer, O/o. The Town Panchayat, Illupur Post & Taluk, Pudukkottai District. .. Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for records of respondent in impugned tender notification and quash the clause No.6 of the impugned tender notification in Na.Ka.No.414/2017, dated 09.11.2017 as illegal and arbitrary and in consequence thereof direct the respondent to scrutinize the petitioner's tender schedule application without reference to the clause No.6 of impugned tender notification. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For Respondent : Mr.M.Rajarajan